You are leaving Medscape Education
Cancel Continue
Log in to save activities Your saved activities will show here so that you can easily access them whenever you're ready. Log in here CME & Education Log in to keep track of your credits.
 

CME/CE

Breast-Feeding May Not Reduce Risk for Asthma or Allergy

  • Authors: News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
    CME Author: Penny Murata, MD
  • CME/CE Released: 9/17/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 10/15/2008
  • THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT
  • Valid for credit through: 10/15/2009, 11:59 PM EST
Start Activity


Target Audience and Goal Statement

This article is intended for primary care clinicians, pulmonologists, allergists, and other specialists who care for children at risk for asthma and allergy.

The goal of this activity is to provide medical news to primary care clinicians and other healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care.

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  1. Report whether prolonged and exclusive breast-feeding decreases the risk for childhood asthma, allergy, and eczema symptoms.
  2. Report whether prolonged and exclusive breast-feeding decreases the risk for positive skin prick test results in childhood.


Disclosures

As an organization accredited by the ACCME, Medscape, LLC requires everyone who is in a position to control the content of an education activity to disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The ACCME defines "relevant financial relationships" as financial relationships in any amount, occurring within the past 12 months, including financial relationships of a spouse or life partner, that could create a conflict of interest.

Medscape, LLC encourages Authors to identify investigational products or off-label uses of products regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration, at first mention and where appropriate in the content.


Author(s)

  • Laurie Barclay, MD

    Laurie Barclay is a freelance reviewer and writer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author(s)

  • Penny Murata, MD

    Penny Murata, MD is a freelancer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Disclosure: Penny Murata, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

  • Penny Murata, MD

    Penny Murata is a freelancer for Medscape.

    Disclosures

    Penny Murata, MD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.


Accreditation Statements

    For Physicians

  • Medscape, LLC is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    Medscape, LLC designates this educational activity for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™ . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Medscape Medical News has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 350 Prescribed credits by the American Academy of Family Physicians. AAFP accreditation begins 09/01/08. Term of approval is for 1 year from this date. This activity is approved for 0.25 Prescribed credits. Credit may be claimed for 1 year from the date of this activity.

    Note: Total credit is subject to change based on topic selection and article length.


    AAFP Accreditation Questions

    Contact This Provider

    For Nurses

  • This Activity is sponsored by Medscape Continuing Education Provider Unit.

    Medscape is an approved provider of continuing nursing education by the New York State Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation.

    Awarded 0.25 contact hour(s) of continuing nursing education for RNs and APNs; None of these credits is in the area of pharmacology.

    Provider Number: 6FDKKC-PRV-05

    Contact This Provider

For questions regarding the content of this activity, contact the accredited provider for this CME/CE activity noted above. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]


Instructions for Participation and Credit

There are no fees for participating in or receiving credit for this online educational activity. For information on applicability and acceptance of continuing education credit for this activity, please consult your professional licensing board.

This activity is designed to be completed within the time designated on the title page; physicians should claim only those credits that reflect the time actually spent in the activity. To successfully earn credit, participants must complete the activity online during the valid credit period that is noted on the title page.

Follow these steps to earn CME/CE credit*:

  1. Read the target audience, learning objectives, and author disclosures.
  2. Study the educational content online or printed out.
  3. Online, choose the best answer to each test question. To receive a certificate, you must receive a passing score as designated at the top of the test. Medscape encourages you to complete the Activity Evaluation to provide feedback for future programming.

You may now view or print the certificate from your CME/CE Tracker. You may print the certificate but you cannot alter it. Credits will be tallied in your CME/CE Tracker and archived for 5 years; at any point within this time period you can print out the tally as well as the certificates by accessing "Edit Your Profile" at the top of your Medscape homepage.

*The credit that you receive is based on your user profile.

CME/CE

Breast-Feeding May Not Reduce Risk for Asthma or Allergy

Authors: News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD CME Author: Penny Murata, MDFaculty and Disclosures
THIS ACTIVITY HAS EXPIRED FOR CREDIT

CME/CE Released: 9/17/2007; Reviewed and Renewed: 10/15/2008

Valid for credit through: 10/15/2009, 11:59 PM EST

processing....

September 17, 2007 — Prolonged or exclusive breast-feeding did not reduce the risk for asthma, hay fever, or eczema at the age of 6.5 years, according to results of a large cluster randomized study published in the September 11 Online First issue of BMJ.

"Whether breast feeding protects against the development of allergy and asthma has been frequently studied and hotly debated for more than 70 years," write Michael S. Kramer, from McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and colleagues from the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) Study Group. "Research findings indicating a beneficial effect have been most consistent for atopic eczema during infancy, but the evidence on asthma and other atopic outcomes (including hay fever, food allergies, and positive skin tests) has been far more mixed."

At 31 Belarussian maternity hospitals and their associated polyclinics, 17,046 mother-infant pairs were enrolled and randomized to receive or not to receive a breast-feeding promotion intervention modeled on the World Health Organization/United Nations Children's Fund baby-friendly hospital initiative. Of the 17,046 mother-infant pairs, 13,889 (81.5%) were followed up when the children were aged 6.5 years. The primary endpoints were responses on the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire and skin prick test results for 5 inhalant antigens.

The intervention was associated with a large increase in exclusive breast-feeding at 3 months (44.3% vs 6.4%; P < .001). Prevalence of any breast-feeding was also significantly higher in this group at all ages up to and including 12 months.

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had no decrease in risk for allergic symptoms and diagnoses or in positive skin prick test results. When 6 sites (3 experimental and 3 control sites) with suspiciously high rates of positive skin prick test results were excluded, risks were 2- to 3-fold higher in the experimental group for 4 of the 5 antigens.

"These results do not support a protective effect of prolonged and exclusive breast feeding on asthma or allergy," the authors write.

Study limitations include the population being restricted to Eastern Europe; extremely low reported histories of eczema at 6.5 years, which are likely to be gross underestimates; and exceedingly high rates of positive skin test results at 6 of the study sites.

"Given these results based on a large randomised trial and the inconsistent benefits reported in previous studies, public health measures to increase the initiation, duration, and exclusivity of breast feeding seem unlikely to have a major impact on reducing the incidence of atopic diseases," the authors conclude. "The fact that most atopic outcomes have increased in incidence over the past several decades, simultaneous with the renaissance in breast feeding, strongly suggests that breast feeding does not have a potent protective effect at the population level. Thus, our results underline the importance of seeking other explanations for the recent epidemic of allergy and asthma and of investigating other potential causative factors to develop and test new preventive interventions."

The Canadian Institutes of Health funded this study. The authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

BMJ. Published online September 11, 2007.

Clinical Context

The effect of breast-feeding on the subsequent development of asthma, eczema, and allergy has not been clearly determined. In the October 21, 1995, issue of The Lancet, Saarinen and Kajosaari reported a beneficial effect of breast-feeding, whereas in the September 21, 2002, issue of The Lancet, Sears and colleagues reported no risk reduction. Methodology of studies can be challenging in that randomization of infants to breast-feeding or formula feeding is not feasible.

In the January 24-31, 2001, issue of JAMA, Kramer and colleagues described the PROBIT study, based on the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund guidelines. In the Republic of Belarus, 17,046 breast-fed infants from 31 centers were randomized to the breast-feeding intervention program or routine care. Breast-feeding was more common in the intervention vs control group at age 3 months (73% vs 60%), 6 months (50% vs 36%), 9 months (36% vs 24%), and 12 months (20% vs 11%). Exclusive breast-feeding was also more common in the intervention vs control group at age 3 months (43% vs 6%) and 6 months (8% vs 0.6%).

This study follows up subjects from the PROBIT study to assess whether those who participated in the breast-feeding intervention program have a lower risk for (1) symptoms of asthma, hay fever, and eczema and (2) positive skin prick test results at the age of 6.5 years.

Study Highlights

  • 13,889 (81.5%) of 17,046 healthy, full-term infants weighing at least 2500 g enrolled in the original PROBIT study were evaluated for follow-up visit at 6.5 years.
  • 3157 children were lost to follow-up (2938), had died (88), or were unable to return (131).
  • Breast-feeding intervention and control groups were similar in maternal age (20 - 34 years; 81% - 83%), maternal education (advanced secondary or partial university, 48% - 54%), number of other children at home (none, 54% - 59%), breast-feeding of previous child, family history of atopy (3% - 5%), cesarean delivery, smoking during pregnancy (2% - 3%), birth weight (3440 - 3441 g), gestational age, sex (boys, 51% - 52%), and 5- minute Apgar score.
  • Follow-up rates were 80.2% for intervention and 82.9% for control groups.
  • Interviews and examinations were conducted at a mean age 6.6 years (SD, 0.3).
  • Positive responses to the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood questionnaire were similar for intervention and control groups:
    • Ever had sneezing (11.0% vs 9.6%).
    • Wheezing in past 12 months (3.4% vs 2.8%).
    • Ever had asthma (1.4% vs 1.0%).
    • Ever had hay fever symptoms (5.4% vs 3.8%).
    • Hay fever symptoms in past 12 months (3.7% vs 2.8%).
    • Recurrent itchy rash (4.9% vs 3.6%).
    • Ever had eczema (1.0% vs 1.1%).
  • 11,772 (85%) children agreed to undergo skin prick tests to 5 antigens: house dust mite, cat, birch pollen, mixed northern grasses, and Alternaria.
  • 11,146 (95%) had valid skin prick test results, defined by positive histamine test of wheal at least 3 mm or flare at least 5 mm.
  • Positive skin test results, defined by mean wheal at least 3 mm or flare at least 10 mm after subtracting measurements for saline control, were similar for intervention and control groups.
  • Of 190 audited children, 54 (28%) consented to repeat skin tests, which showed high intraclass correlation coefficients.
  • Positive skin test results were clustered among some clinics: 6 clinics (3 intervention and 3 control) had at least 10% positive skin test results.
  • Among children with family history of atopy, the intervention group had increased risk for history of ever wheezing and positive skin prick test results for mixed northern grasses.

Pearls for Practice

  • A breast-feeding promotion intervention program does not affect the risk for asthma, allergy, and eczema symptoms by the age of 6.5 years.
  • A breast-feeding promotion intervention program does not decrease the risk for positive skin prick test results by the age of 6.5 years.

CME/CE Test

  • Print